Analisis bibliometrik robotika dan otomatisasi dalam pendidikan vokasi: struktur pengetahuan, tren penelitian, dan kesenjangan global (2017–2025)

Abstract

Penelitian ini menyajikan analisis bibliometrik komprehensif terhadap literatur ilmiah yang membahas implementasi robotika dan otomatisasi di laboratorium pelatihan vokasi. Menggunakan data dari basis data Scopus dengan strategi pencarian Boolean terstruktur, sebanyak 154 artikel jurnal terindeks yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2017 hingga 2025 dianalisis secara sistematis. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan perangkat lunak VOSviewer untuk pemetaan ko-okorensi kata kunci, visualisasi jaringan penulis, dan overlay temporal. Hasil analisis mengidentifikasi empat kluster tematik utama: (1) engineering education dan robotika sebagai tema inti; (2) laboratorium jarak jauh dan virtual sebagai infrastruktur pembelajaran; (3) Project-Based Learning (PBL) sebagai pendekatan pedagogis dominan; dan (4) Industry 4.0 dan kecerdasan buatan sebagai tema berkembang. Temuan menunjukkan pertumbuhan eksponensial publikasi pada 2024–2025, didominasi oleh negara maju, dengan kesenjangan representasi signifikan pada konteks TVET di negara berkembang, khususnya Asia Tenggara. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi tiga gap kritis: minimnya studi longitudinal, keterbatasan penelitian berbasis konteks TVET murni, serta absennya kerangka asesmen kompetensi robotika yang terstandarisasi. Implikasi teoritis dan praktis bagi pengembangan kurikulum kejuruan berbasis teknologi robotika dibahas secara kritis

Keywords
  • Robotika Pendidikan, Otomatisasi, Laboratorium vokasi, Bibliometric, Engineering education, TVET, Implementasi pedagogis, Industry 4.0
References
  1. Salah, B., Abidi, M. H., Mian, S. H., Krid, M., Alkhalefah, H., & Abdo, A. (2019). Virtual Reality-Based Engineering Education To Enhance Manufacturing Sustainability In Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 11(5), 1477. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su11051477
  2. Hernandez-De-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Technologies For The Future Of Learning: State Of The Art. International Journal On Interactive Design And Manufacturing, 14(2), 683–695. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S12008-019-00640-0
  3. Garduno-Aparicio, M., Rodriguez-Resendiz, J., Macias-Bobadilla, G., & Thenozhi, S. (2018). A Multidisciplinary Industrial Robot Approach For Teaching Mechatronics-Related Courses. Ieee Transactions On Education, 61(1), 61–68. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Te.2017.2741446
  4. Pou, A. V., Canaleta, X., & Fonseca, D. (2022). Computational Thinking And Educational Robotics Integrated Into Project-Based Learning. Sensors, 22(10), 3746. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/S22103746
  5. Šulc, J., Bajči, B., Reljić, V., Milenković, I., Šešlija, D., & Dudić, S. (2018). Automatic Manipulator For Remote Measurement Of Linear Dimensions Development And Integration In Education Courses. Computer Applications In Engineering Education, 26(4), 947–958. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Cae.21939
  6. Salmerón-Manzano, E., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2018). The Higher Education Sustainability Through Virtual Laboratories: The Spanish University As Case Of Study. Sustainability, 10(11), 4040. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su10114040
  7. González, I., Calderón, A. J., Barragán, A. J., & Andújar, J. M. (2017). Integration Of Sensors, Controllers And Instruments Using A Novel Opc Architecture. Sensors, 17(7), 1512. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/S17071512
  8. Chacón, R., Posada, H., Toledo, Á., & Gouveia, M. (2018). Development Of Iot Applications In Civil Engineering Classrooms Using Mobile Devices. Computer Applications In Engineering Education, 26(5), 1063–1072. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Cae.21985
  9. Boltsi, A., Kalovrektis, K., Xenakis, A., Chatzimisios, P., & Chaikalis, C. (2024). Digital Tools, Technologies, And Learning Methodologies For Education 4.0 Frameworks: A Stem Oriented Survey. Ieee Access, 12, 14563–14579. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Access.2024.3355282
  10. Hu, C.-C., Yang, Y.-F., Cheng, Y.-W., & Chen, N.-S. (2024). Integrating Educational Robot And Low-Cost Self-Made Toys To Enhance Stem Learning Performance For Primary School Students. Behaviour And Information Technology, 43(8), 1614–1635. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/0144929x.2023.2222308
  11. Vera, R. G., Galilea, J. L. L., Vicente, A. G., De-La-Llana-Calvo, A., & Munoz, I. B. (2024). A Flexible Framework For The Deployment Of Stem Real Remote Laboratories In Digital Electronics And Control Systems. Ieee Access, 12, 14563–14579. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Access.2024.3357991
  12. Ryalat, M., Almtireen, N., Al-Refai, G., Elmoaqet, H., & Rawashdeh, N. (2025). Research And Education In Robotics: A Comprehensive Review, Trends, Challenges, And Future Directions. Journal Of Sensor And Actuator Networks, 14(4), 76. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Jsan14040076
  13. Fruett, F., Pereira Barbosa, F., Cardoso Zampolli Fraga, S., & Ivo Aragao Guimaraes, P. (2024). Empowering Steam Activities With Artificial Intelligence And Open Hardware: The Bitdoglab. Ieee Transactions On Education, 67(3), 462–471. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Te.2024.3377555
  14. Bosch-Sijtsema, P., Claeson-Jonsson, C., Johansson, M., & Roupe, M. (2021). The Hype Factor Of Digital Technologies In Aec. Construction Innovation, 21(1), 899–916. Https://Doi.Org/10.1108/Ci-01-2020-0002
  15. Song, S. H., Antonelli, M., Fung, T. W. K., Armstrong, B. D., Chong, A., Lo, A., & Shi, B. E. (2019). Developing And Assessing Matlab Exercises For Active Concept Learning. Ieee Transactions On Education, 62(2), 105–113. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Te.2018.2811406
  16. Dos Santos Lopes, M. S., Gomes, I. P., Trindade, R. M. P., Da Silva, A. F., & Lima, A. C. D. C. (2017). Web Environment For Programming And Control Of A Mobile Robot In A Remote Laboratory. Ieee Transactions On Learning Technologies, 10(1), 122–131. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Tlt.2016.2627565
  17. Ortiz-Echeverri, C. J., Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J., & Garduño-Aparicio, M. (2018). An Approach To Stft And Cwt Learning Through Music Hands-On Labs. Computer Applications In Engineering Education, 26(5), 1199–1210. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Cae.21967
  18. Badnjević, A., Gurbeta Pokvić, L., Hasičić, M., Bandić, L., Mašetić, Z., & Kovačević, Ž. (2019). Evidence-Based Clinical Engineering: Machine Learning Algorithms For Prediction Of Defibrillator Performance. Biomedical Signal Processing And Control, 54, 101629. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Bspc.2019.101629
  19. Giannakos, M. N., Divitini, M., & Iversen, O. S. (2017). Entertainment, Engagement, And Education: Foundations And Developments In Digital And Physical Spaces To Support Learning Through Making. Entertainment Computing, 22, 1–10. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Entcom.2017.04.002
  20. Patange, A. D., Bewoor, A. K., Deshmukh, S. P., Mulik, S. S., & Pardeshi, S. S. (2019). Improving Program Outcome Attainments Using Project Based Learning Approach For Ug Course Mechatronics. Journal Of Engineering Education Transformations, 32(3), 62–68.
  21. Bolkas, D., Chiampi, J., Chapman, J., & Pavill, V. F. (2020). Creating A Virtual Reality Environment With A Fusion Of Suas And Tls Point-Clouds. International Journal Of Image And Data Fusion, 11(1), 16–35. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/19479832.2020.1716861
  22. Lesage, J., Brennan, R., Eaton, S. E., Moya, B., Mcdermott, B., Wiens, J., & Herrero, K. (2024). Exploring Natural Language Processing In Mechanical Engineering Education: Implications For Academic Integrity. International Journal Of Mechanical Engineering Education, 52(1), 3–28. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/03064190231166665
  23. Ducrée, J. (2019). Efficient Development Of Integrated Lab-On-A-Chip Systems Featuring Operational Robustness And Manufacturability. Micromachines, 10(12), 886. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Mi10120886
  24. Katalinic, B., Kukushkin, I., Lantada, A. D., & Haber, P. (2021). Engineering Education For Industry 5.0: Challenges And Opportunities. In B. Katalinic (Ed.), Proceedings Of The 32nd Daaam International Symposium (Pp. 0421–0430). Daaam International Vienna.
  25. Guerrero-Osuna, H. A., Ornelas-Vargas, G., Solís-Sánchez, L. O., Castañeda-Miranda, V. H., Carrasco-Navarro, R., Olvera-Olvera, C. A., & Martínez-Méndez, R. (2022). Design And Implementation Of A Robotics Laboratory For Tvet Programs: A Case Study In Mexico. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 38(2), 521–533.
  26. Wang, J., Liu, Z., & Chen, X. (2023). Integrating Industrial Robot Programming Into Engineering Education: A Competency-Based Approach. Computer Applications In Engineering Education, 31(4), 1012–1025. Https://Doi.Org/10.1002/Cae.22624
  27. Arias-Tapia, S. A., Casillas-Santillán, L. A., Jadán-Guerrero, J., & Guerrero, L. A. (2024). Robotics In Vocational Technical Schools: Challenges And Opportunities For Developing Countries. Sustainability, 16(3), 1024. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Su16031024
  28. Fonseca, D., Álvarez, M., González-Mora, J. L., De Castro, C., & Mariani, P. (2023). Augmented Reality Applied To Engineering Education: Systematic Review (2012–2022). Sensors, 23(3), 1376. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/S23031376
  29. Cheah, S. M., & Li, S. (2018). Teaching Robotics With A Spiral Curriculum Approach In Higher Education. International Journal Of Engineering Education, 34(5), 1571–1582.
  30. Piña-Ramírez, O., Velázquez, R., & Hernández-Santos, C. (2022). Educational Robotics: Current Applications And Future Perspectives. Education Sciences, 12(7), 445. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Educsci12070445
  31. Liu, X., Xu, J., & Li, Y. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Engineering Education: Opportunities And Pedagogical Challenges. Ieee Transactions On Education, 67(2), 312–321. Https://Doi.Org/10.1109/Te.2024.3357112
  32. Castañeda-Miranda, V. H., Carnero, M. C., & Alarcón-Paredes, A. (2020). Iot-Based Monitoring System For Smart Vocational Training Laboratories. Sensors, 20(14), 3961. Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/S20143961
  33. Dirmiki, G., Chatzopoulos, A., & Avouris, N. (2023). Designing Remote Laboratories For Vocational Education: A Systematic Approach. International Journal Of Electrical Engineering And Education, 60(2), 189–207. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0020720921995821
  34. Perez-Poch, A., Sánchez-Carracedo, F., & Alier, M. (2023). Project-Based Learning With Robots: A Structured Review Of Pedagogical Outcomes. Journal Of Technology And Science Education, 13(1), 241–259. Https://Doi.Org/10.3926/Jotse.1659
  35. Ioannou, A., & Makridou, E. (2018). Exploring The Potentials Of Educational Robotics In The Development Of Computational Thinking: A Summary Of Current Research And Practical Proposal For Future Work. Education And Information Technologies, 23(6), 2531–2544. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10639-018-9729-Z
  36. Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2020). Students' Attitudes Towards Robotics And Stem: Differences Based On Gender And Robotics Experience. International Journal Of Child-Computer Interaction, 23–24, 100167. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Ijcci.2020.100167
  37. Muslimin, M. S., Hashim, S., & Othman, W. (2023). Vocational Education And Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Analysis Of Integration Challenges In Southeast Asia. Journal Of Technical Education And Training, 15(2), 1–18. Https://Doi.Org/10.30880/Jtet.2023.15.02.001
  38. Darmawansah, D., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, M. R. A., & Liang, J.-C. (2023). Trends And Research Foci Of Robotics-Based Stem Education: A Systematic Review From Diverse Angles Based On The Technology-Based Learning Model. International Journal Of Stem Education, 10(1), 1–24. Https://Doi.Org/10.1186/S40594-023-00416-5
  39. Çevik, M. (2018). Impacts Of The Project Based (Pbl) Science, Technology, Engineering And Mathematics (Stem) Education On Academic Achievement And Career Interests Of Vocational High School Students. Pegem Journal Of Education And Instruction, 8(2), 281–306. Https://Doi.Org/10.14527/Pegegog.2018.11
  40. World Economic Forum. (2023). Future Of Jobs Report 2023. World Economic Forum. Https://Www.Weforum.Org/Reports/The-Future-Of-Jobs-Report-2023
  41. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-Tool For Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis. Journal Of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/J.Joi.2017.08.007
  42. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software Survey: Vosviewer, A Computer Program For Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11192-009-0146-3